The pro-life argument is either sound or unsound. Dismissing it with a phony appeal to tolerance is not going to work.

When Christians engage politically, they are doing so for the right reasons: that of loving their neighbor and promoting human flourishing.

On today’s episode, we dissect a commenter’s arguments against the pro-life stance. We learn to use logic and our syllogism to reveal the fallacies in his reasoning.

It’s not pro-lifers who refuse to protect children once they’re born. It’s pro-abortion Democrats.

The pro-life argument stands on its merits, not the behavior of the person making the argument. Whether I hate women or love them is irrelevant to the question, “what is the unborn?”

Lazy dismissals of the pro-life argument will not work long-term. It might score you brief political points, but overtime your influence wane.

Christians need to avoid a technological morality that says, “Just because we can do it, we ought to do it.” IVF is technologically doable, but it doesn’t mean Christians should rush into creating children using a method that is an ethical minefield.

When pro-abortionists claim you can’t know anything on abortion, how do they know that?

Nearly all arguments for abortion at the street level assume the unborn are not human. They don’t argue that the unborn are not human, they simply assume they’re not human.