For years pro-lifers have been reluctant to show the imagery that is most directly related to the topic of abortion. But we will continue to lose if we do not use imagery to both establish the humanity of the unborn and the inhumanity of abortion.

The validity and soundness of the pro-life argument does not turn on whether people like it.

Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched. Poling data doesn’t always mean victory. In the Mailbag we tackle whether or not we need to know the embryo has a soul before we can say we can intentionally kill him.

The Bible does not teach that we are not human until we breathe.

The burning research lab example that pro-abortionists use:

#1. Does not prove the unborn are not human.

#2. Does not prove it’s OK to intentionally kill them.

Pro-life laws protecting the unborn are not killing women. Giving drugs to women without medical supervision through the mail may in fact kill them.

Christian leaders who claim to be pro-life but refuse to lift a finger to stop the killing will be held accountable for lives that could have been saved had they been more courageous.

Christians often say goofy things about abortion; it is typical for their IQ to drop 80 points when the topic is put on the table. However, it is essential for Christians to bring people back to the basic argument that pro-lifers make: that it is always wrong to intentionally kill innocent human beings.

When the political tides are not in our favor, we must still act culturally to promote the truth of the pro-life position

An interview with Mark Harrington